The eternal debate of globalization vs. localization is one that poses a big challenge for Indian manufacturers today. As India is on the verge of emerging as the global hub for manufacturing, the pressing need for companies has been and continues to be how to better merge these two often conflicting strategies. Globalization and localization as strategies have certain advantages and challenges which, if understood in terms of their harmonization way, retain the competitive advantage through the complex landscape of modern manufacturing.
Many Indian manufacturing companies have risen with the wave of globalization. The interdependencies among nations gave new avenues to Indian manufacturers—participating in international supply chains, entering new markets, and increasing economies of scale. Such global exposure enables Indian companies to source raw materials from various parts of the world, work out the best route of production, and sell products globally, which might result in higher revenues and growth.
A good example of a country using globalization effectively is Tata Motors, one of the leading automobile companies in India. The company has growing market presence through various plants built in different countries, which makes the company be locally responsive and enjoy the benefit of local efficiency. Manufacturing its vehicles closer to its largest markets allows Tata to save on transportation costs and develop products for local standards and tastes.
Similarly, globalization has aided pharmaceutical giants from India, like Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, in spreading their wings across borders. Acquiring international pharmaceutical companies and building up its manufacturing units abroad has provided an entry into new products and markets for Sun Pharma. This strategy has kept Sun Pharma ahead of the competition and in the midst of all action in both developed and emerging markets.
However, this shift towards globalization is not easy to implement. Be it the political instability, fluctuating exchange rates, or most importantly, the complex regulatory environments in foreign markets—there are a range of challenges that lie ahead for Indian manufacturers. Not to forget, sophisticated logistics and coordination in managing a global supply chain comes at a price and often involves complications. All these challenges must be negotiated by firms while ensuring that quality is maintained and diversified regulations across regions are followed.
On the other hand, localization refers to manufacturing strategies tailored to address the particular needs and preferences of local markets. In this respect, localization can be an advantage to Indian manufacturers with regard to responsiveness and market relevance. Focusing on local production enables companies to understand and fulfill the unique demands of the Indian consumer better, coming up with products that are attuned to local tastes and standards.
A good example is that of the consumer goods industry and market leaders such as Hindustan Unilever, which has been a master of localized manufacturing through multiple plants across India. This enables HUL to cater to regional preferences and demands quickly in order to customize its products according to local taste preferences.
Localizing production in response to the diversified needs of the Indian market has assisted Indian textile firms, for example, Arvind Mills. It produces fabrics and garments locally so as to react quickly to changing fashions and consumer preferences in a bid to improve on its market agility.
Localizing can support economic growth through the creation of jobs and local industry expansions. Being the largest two-wheeler manufacturer, it has established its production base not only in every part of the country but also in many parts of the world. Such investment in the region supports the development of the area and helps to build a skilled workforce, which is in line with the Indian government's "Make in India" initiative.
The key to an effective manufacturing strategy would be finding a proper balance between globalization and localization. Any Indian manufacturer would go a long way in deciding on the best approach by making proper assessment of the dynamics of the industry, market demand, and strategic goals. Indeed, in many companies, such a hybrid strategy that combines both globalization and localization may be useful.
“If you are looking to build trust and establish a strong connection with potential customers in a new market, localization is probably the best approach for you. But if you're looking to reach as many people as possible with your product or service, globalization is probably the better option,” -Stefano Potortí President of UK Confederation.
For instance, firms like Mahindra & Mahindra—a leader in the automotive and farm equipment sectors—has opted for a hybrid model. In other words, while setting up a global footprint in terms of manufacturing units abroad, an intensely local orientation in production has been maintained within India. This two-prong strategyhas allowed Mahindra to leverageglobal efficiencies and market demand while being responsive to domestic market needs.
Another good example is the Indian electronics firm, Samsung India. Although Samsung India actually manufactures quite substantial products in India to meet demand within the country, it sources parts and technology from its international network. This strategy enables the firm to tap into global innovation while delivering local products that meet requirements and price points.
A changing India will see the manufacturing powerhouses remain only as agile and adaptive as both global and local trends will make them out to be. From the point of view of a company, the future of manufacturing will probably lie in an amplified engagement with digital technologies and increased attention towards sustainability, besides a more nuanced approach towards globalization and localization.
Companies will have to keep re-evaluating their global and local strategies so that these sets of strategies keep aligning with changing market conditions and consumer preferences. Effective market research, investment in state-of-the-art technologies, and relationship-building with local players would help the firms navigate through globalization and localization issues.
Ultimately, the success of a manufacturing strategy in India will have to depend on companies' ability to balance the benefits associated with global reach with advantages accruing from local relevance. This could be a strategic alignment of operations toward global and local needs that will help Indian manufacturers gear up for long-term success in a world becoming increasingly interconnected.
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Read more...
