AUGUST 202419Articulating Return-On-Investment (ROI ) calculation providing evidence of the long-term financial viability of Biosolutions through ROI calculations will help farmers make informed decisionsmolecules. Moreover, the low incidences of pest resistance to Biocontrol products compared to the resurgence phenomenon associated with chemical controls, when used improperly or in high dosages, further highlights their effectiveness.Numerous scientific innovations and research support the equivalence of biocontrol products to chemical methods in managing pests and diseases. However, certain roadblocks hinder the widespread adoption of Biocontrol solutions, and addressing these is essential to reach more farmers.The first challenge is the lack of awareness among farmers regarding the benefits of Biocontrol products. Currently, farming practices tend to focus more on control than integrated pest management, leading them to prefer chemicals with quick knock-down effects. Creating awareness and educating farmers about the advantages of Biocontrol can gradually shift this mindset. Another hurdle is that the majority of existing Biocontrol products are specific to particular pests or diseases, unlike chemical molecules that offer broad-spectrum coverage.To make Biosolutions a more viable alternative to chemical methods, continuous innovation, creating awareness, addressing existing limitations are necessary to develop solutions that can target a wider range of pests and diseases.What are the major barriers and limitations associated with scaling up Biosolutions technologies to be applicable on a large-scale in agricultural systems?With the continuous advancement of science and technology, Biosolutions are indeed becoming more versatile, resistant to environmental conditions, and compatible with conventional chemicals. However, one of the significant challenges lies in replicating consistent results across diverse agro-climatic conditions and soil types. Soil characteristics, nutrient availability, and climate play pivotal roles in determining the efficacy of Biosolutions. Adapting these solutions to varying agricultural environments remains a complex task.Lack of awareness among farmers and the public perception that Biologicals cannot be mixed with chemicals, lead to the misconception that using BioSolutions incurs additional costs and is considered to be expensive for adoption in regular cultivation schedules. Reaching smallholder farmers, in particular, can be difficult due to fragmented and scattered cropping patterns, making it difficult to introduce and promote Biosolutions effectively. Regulatory frameworks have also posed hindrances for Biosolutions. The stringent data requirements and lack of clear distinction between biologicals and chemicals in regulatory processes create complexities for manufacturers. The time and costs involved in product registration are also significant limitations faced by many companies. Collaborative efforts between government regulatory bodies, ministries, industry stakeholders, and research institutions are crucial to streamline regulatory processes and provide support for the adoption of Biosolutions technologies on a larger scale.Biosolutions contribute to enhancing crop yields and overall agricultural productivity. What are the key challenges in optimizing their effectiveness across diverse agricultural environments?Achieving consistent effectiveness of Biosolutions across diverse agricultural environments requires a deep understanding of local soil and climate conditions. The efficacy of these solutions can vary depending on factors such as soil type, temperature, moisture levels, and nutrient availability. Additionally, changing weather patterns and the imbalanced use of chemical fertilizers deteriorate the soil health, making it unfavorable for natural biologicals to survive and contribute to enhancing crop yields.
< Page 9 | Page 11 >